If You Do Not See The Term, “Kilowatt-Hours”, You’re Wasting Your Time
It is a big deal to some that government is pushing the electrification of surface transportation in the US. This concern is proper, for government has botched many public measures, and “gasohol” is a major failure, wasting energy and foodstuffs in a variety of ways not discussed here, but easily discovered by the witful.
Electric transportation is NOT one of those mistakes. Let us see why:
In Gray: Waste Heat (click to zoom)
Waste heat, called “rejected energy” by engineers, is highest by
percentage in transportation services. Look at the ratio of black to gray on
the right of the pink “Transportation” block. Not only does your car or truck
idle in traffic, and run at other than its most efficient speed most of the
time, it blows ~3 times the energy used to propel you out the tailpipe and
another bunch of heat through the radiator, doing nothing at all but heating
your vicinity and expelling poisonous gases.
This is the biggest reason electric motors appeal to people who
simply don’t want to pay for waste.
So, here are some advantages of electrifying cars, trucks and buses:
- No lubricant service.
Internal combustion engines contaminate oil, and a small amount must
escape the engine in the process of lubricating cylinder walls. This is a
major reason internal combustion engines fail: an owner has no idea what
an oil change is other than an expense. You will see nice cars abandoned
in neighborhoods all over America because of this - the owner could not comprehend that clean oil is necessary, and could or would not read or believe the owner's manual. Sealed electric motors
flatly do not require lubricant changes.
- No coolant service.
Though they last for more than three years in nearly all cases, gas and
diesel engine coolants leak and age. Electric motors need far less cooling than those of internal combustion because they do not produce power by converting heat to
mechanical energy. These do not overheat, or freeze, OR require warmup to
operate properly.
- No transmission required.
Though it is true that an electric motor does have an operating speed
which is ideal for its design, it can be supplied through a Variable
Frequency Drive to produce the desired road speed (electric motor speed is
proportional to supply frequency), thus eliminating any need for a transmission, with its lubricant and other maintenance demands. This drive can be programmed to save
energy. Most conventional engines must be oversized or possess added
devices like turbo-supercharging to deal with acceleration or increased
load, in addition to a transmission to match the efficient speed of said
engine to desired road speed. The internal combustion engine demands a
transmission because its operation depends on intake and exhaust resonance
to move gases to and from its cylinders.
- Regenerative braking. When
you want to stop, part of that energy of motion can be returned to the
battery in a way that does not use up brake life.
- No storage procedures. If
you need to leave your car somewhere, nothing rusts, gels or loses
lubricant, and there are few plastics underhood to age and crack.
- Inherent high torque. Due
to some interesting electrical laws, a 150HP electric motor makes about
600 lb-ft of torque. Ask a Tesla owner – you’re not tweeting along in
George Jetson’s car. Ford has actually run an electric Mustang over 170MPH in the 1/4-mile, in less than 8.2 seconds.
- Lowers fossil fuel demand. The
case can be made that most personal use is trivial. Look at traffic
patterns during peak hours, and notice that nearly all of that traffic is
within 25 miles of the motorist’s home. That travel is easily electrified.
Fossil fuel really IS limited – nobody is making any more, period – and
food distribution worldwide depends on fossil fuel for delivery without
spoilage. That’s part of the industry that CANNOT depend on other energy.
So it makes sense in the long run to cut back on oil consumption. Thinking
the same demand just gets transferred to electrical power plants? Please
read the graphic above and examine it closely.
- Simplifies the transition to durable
vehicles. The
industry now depends on continuous renewal of inventory and scrappage –
even though it is not strictly necessary, even with internal combustion
engines. You could be sold a car
which lasts, but you aren’t, because it doesn’t reward companies with
continuous income. This feature does depend on a major change in business
models.
- No direct emissions. The
generation of the electricity stored in the electric vehicle’s battery
comes from locations amenable to far more effective emissions controls. Again, examine the above graphic.
Objections:
- Battery technology is environmentally
expensive. True.
Another market reality is that since multiple countries are competing for raw materials, their price WILL go up. Mitigating factors are 1) the recycling industry has not geared up yet, 2) Discarded conventional cars and trucks litter the landscape right now by the millions, 3) The lifetime of a properly built electrical drivetrain is several times longer than the best internal combustion engine and is far simpler, producing far less “parts trash”, 4) Fossil fuel supply chains produce spillage and vapor releases to the environment. There will be no electrical Exxon Valdez, or Deepwater Horizon. - Battery fires are intense.
True.
They burn hotter than gasoline or diesel, too. You will note that many traffic accidents with fuel fires burn out before firemen act, including those that total the vehicle and/or produce a fatality. Battery protection isn’t bad, and it can be improved further. Electrical fires do NOT spread like liquid fires do. EV fires are featured today because they are a novelty; ICE car fires are common. - The average home can’t recharge an electric
car. False.
Here’s why I say you need to recognize the term, “kilowatt-hour”.
A Kilowatt-hour (kWh) is a quantity, a measure of potential or expended energy equivalent to a volume of fossil fuel. It is actually the equal of about 0.17 pounds of regular gasoline (make no mistake, gasoline is very powerful, it’s the way we use it that’s extremely wasteful!), and it represents the raw expenditure of one horsepower for about an hour and 20 minutes. Its advantage goes beyond the fact that most of its energy will not be lost through a tailpipe, in that it can be replenished over time.
See, within the heat limits of the battery, you can charge that kWh in an hour at 1000 watts, or in ten hours at 100 watts. If your house has a water heater, you can charge up to a rate of about 1 kWh per 10 minutes. On a clear day, a rooftop solar panel that comes with the car could charge 500 watts continuously, more on a minivan.
Don’t miss that this kWh isn’t going out a tailpipe. Gas engines use about 4 times the energy on the road than they need to move the car.
- No range. False.
This actually depends on driving habits, just like with ordinary cars. The popular hangup seems to be transferred from the idea that you can’t charge the car at home, and somehow, the thing won’t work unless it’s fully charged all the time. Although some people struggle to keep gas in the car and can’t keep their phone charged, that’s not the device’s fault. In fact, all commercial vehicles, like buses and trucks in local service, will always have charge – and there goes a bunch of city emissions. Note that nobody is using interchangeable batteries yet – where you can pull up somewhere and swap your low cell for a charged one?
- Government intervention is forcing electric vehicles on the public. TRUE. Now: You may notice that this was once ACTUALLY NECESSARY because smog was literally killing people in population centers, notably in LA. While manufacturers struggled to deal with emissions restrictions at the lowest cost they could manage - meaning, they wanted to keep existing manufacturing plants and methods - we were saddled with gasohol and such spectacles as the 140HP Corvette (1974 5-liter, CA). Since then, the industry has stepped up such that you can buy cars that will run off and hide from even the best of the 1970s, while air-conditioning you, and getting double the mileage of that, er, stuff. You really think the Tesla is the ne plus ultra?
So, the TL;DR:
No oil spillage at dozens of convenience stores and shops in every town. No fuel trucks 5 times a day to your local station.
Wires instead of pipelines, rail and trucking delivering energy. Tiny
maintenance, giant reliability. Lower assembly weight and complexity. Silent
traffic. Clean local air. Far fewer abandoned vehicles.
As it is, personal transportation in the USA is a tremendous mishmash of compromises, largely made with convenience as the major factor. This lack of logic is easy to illustrate: you may go buy a 200HP motorcycle, capable of over 100MPH in first gear, for street use, but you can't take a Kawasaki Mule 4-wheeler to the store. The DOT is supposed to enforce standards w/r/t vehicle lighting, but any look at traffic reveals this to be a boondoggle, a waste of taxpayer money, as nothing is standardized and lots of vehicle lighting is ineffective.
When you think you have a right to energy, you’ve made a mistake.
Figuring out how to do things better is really better for your bank account as
well as the environment, and the likelihood that early measures will not be
optimum is not a reason to abandon all progress.
Go buy a buggy whip and think about the horse. Cars and trucks are wonderful things, and we have not seen the last of them!